ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Family risk factors, dyadic coping, and family resilience in young stroke dyads: an actor-partner interdependence mediation model.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Stroke in young individuals constitutes a significant familial stressor, with ensuing family risk factors critically influencing recovery. While couples' collaborative coping strategies play a vital role in enhancing family resilience, the mechanisms underlying this process remain largely unexplored. This study aims to elucidate the impact of familial risk factors and dyadic coping on the family resilience of young stroke. Methods: This cross-sectional study integrates evidence-based research with clinical data. We developed a structured questionnaire grounded in identified familial risk factors. A cohort of 243 dyads, comprising young stroke patients and their spouses, was recruited from the neurology departments of four tertiary hospitals. The Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model (APIMeM) framework was utilized, in which patients were treated as actors (influencing their own outcomes) and spouses as partners (influencing each other's outcomes), to determine both direct and indirect effects among variables, with significance evaluated using bootstrap procedures (5,000 resamples, 95% confidence intervals). Model simplification was guided by chi-square difference testing. Results: The analysis indicated that family resilience could be strengthened in young stroke survivors and their spouses. APIMeM analyses showed that patients' and spouses' anxiety ( Conclusions: Using a dyadic APIMeM approach, this study demonstrates that dyadic coping serves as a key mediator linking familial risk factors to family resilience in young stroke dyads. Resilience emerges as a shared, co-constructed process rather than an individual attribute, underscoring the need for interventions targeting the couple as a unit to mitigate intervention bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.