Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326041›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026

Electrical storm treated with radiation therapy in a patient with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular thrombus: a case report.

Marc D Lemoine, David Krug, Max Grohmann, Oliver Blanck, Bruno Reissmann

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marc D LemoineDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3799-7962
David KrugDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8811-5416
Max GrohmannDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Oliver BlanckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Bruno ReissmannDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0290-6231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electrical storm in patients with structural heart disease is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation is recommended for drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), but may be contraindicated in the presence of a left ventricular (LV) thrombus due to increased thromboembolic risk. Stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) has emerged as a non-invasive treatment option for refractory VT. This case highlights the potential role of STAR as a rescue therapy when conventional approaches are not feasible. Case summary: An 80-year-old man with advanced ischaemic cardiomyopathy presented after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to monomorphic VT. Evaluation revealed severe LV dysfunction (LVEF 15%), an anteroapical LV aneurysm and a newly detected LV thrombus. Catheter ablation was deferred due to embolic risk. Eleven weeks later, the patient was admitted with recurrent VT and developed electrical storm refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy, overdrive pacing, and bilateral stellate ganglion blockade. Non-invasive target delineation using contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography with scar characterization and ECG-based localization was performed. A single fraction of 25 Gy stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy was delivered to the suspected VT substrate. Electrical storm terminated immediately after treatment, and no further VT episodes occurred during hospitalization or during 6 months of follow-up. Discussion: This case demonstrates that stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy may provide an effective non-invasive rescue strategy for electrical storm when catheter ablation is contraindicated. Integration of advanced cardiac imaging with ECG-based localization enables target definition in the absence of invasive electroanatomical mapping.

Indexed as

Case reportElectrical stormLeft ventricular thrombusNon-invasive ablationStereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR)Ventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID42326041
PMCPMC13282898

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.