ReviewCureus2026
A Systematic Review Evaluating the Impact of Glycemic Control on Mortality and Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a global cause of mortality and morbidity, specifically among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Patients with hyperglycemia had unfavorable outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with a high rate of mortality ranging between 1.5 and 2.5 fold, along with a high incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), compared to normoglycemic patients. Acute hyperglycemia and chronic glycemic exposure are indicated by HbA1c and are related to poor cardiovascular outcomes, which were followed by ACS. The review assessed the current evidence on the effect of the glycemic status and the strategies to control the glycemic level among T2DM patients presenting with ACS. This was a systematic review that was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus were used as search engines to get relevant studies for the review. Eligible studies included those with ACS patients, and the glycemic status was investigated in association with the clinical outcome, such as mortality and MACEs. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the study. Twelve studies included 85,000 patients; the admission of hyperglycemia was strongly related to the worst outcomes after AMI. The all-cause mortality ranges from 9.0% to 25.1%, while the variation in hospital mortality ranges between 1.9% and 9.8%. Various studies have included the high risk associated with high glucose levels. Hyperglycemia was associated with a high rate of adverse cardiac events, including heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and arrhythmias. The study concluded that poor glycemic control increases the rate of mortality during admission, and the adverse cardiac events are also enhanced among type 2 diabetes patients with ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.