ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Comparison of nonsurgical treatment approaches for partial rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff disease constitutes the most common cause of shoulder pain, accounting for up to 70% of shoulder-related complaints, with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PT-RCTs) representing a substantial proportion. Although nonsurgical interventions are generally recommended as first-line treatment, there is currently no consensus on the optimal nonsurgical management of symptomatic PT-RCTs. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of different nonsurgical treatment modalities for PT-RCTs, specifically comparing physical therapy (PT) and injection therapies. Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Eligible studies on nonsurgical interventions for PT-RCTs in adults (≥18a) were included. Clinical outcomes (Constant Score (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and visual analog scale were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis and descriptive statistics to outline study characteristics. Results: From 9,894 records screened, 22 studies with 1,137 patients were included. PT was statistically superior to injection therapy in the CS ( Conclusion: In PT-RCTs, PT shows statistically superior outcomes to injection therapy in the CS. Cell-based injections outperform non-cell-based injections in the CS and exceed MCID in both, the CS and ASES scores, indicating clinical relevance. Both experimental groups for non-cell-based injections and PT show statistical significance in the CS, with non-cell-based injections surpassing the MCID in the CS. These findings highlight the effectiveness of PT and cell-based injections as nonsurgical options, but treatment should be individualized, as no single approach proved clearly superior across all outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.