ArticleACS omega2026
Explainable Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Networks Learn Chemistry from SMILES for Predicting Toxicity of Androgen and Estrogen Receptor Chemicals.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocrine disruption remains a major concern in predictive toxicology, demanding accurate and interpretable models to assess molecular interactions with hormonal pathways. Here, we present a descriptor-free bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) framework designed to predict the toxicity of chemicals toward androgen (AR) and estrogen receptors (ER), two of the most complex and biologically relevant end points in toxicology. The model operates directly on SMILES strings, which are tokenized and converted into one-hot encoded sequences, enabling the automatic extraction of chemically meaningful representations without reliance on handcrafted molecular descriptors or fingerprints. To enhance interpretability, we introduce a novel explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach that aggregates character-level attribution scores into color-coded substructures, revealing features that drive or reduce toxicity and offering mechanistic insight into receptor-mediated effects. The models were trained on publicly available, high-quality data sets comprising 1664 and 1529 chemicals with experimental binary labels for AR and ER, respectively. Employing cross-validation analyses, based on 20% randomly stratified resampling iterated 10 times, the proposed workflow returned accuracy equal to 0.75 ± 0.08 and 0.81 ± 0.05, sensitivity equal to 0.66 ± 0.36 and 0.69 ± 0.17, and specificity equal to 0.76 ± 0.14 and 0.82 ± 0.06 for AR and ER end points, respectively. Our descriptor-free models ensure highly transparent results with a substructure level interpretability. These findings demonstrate the potential of deep learning directly on molecular textual representations to advance predictive toxicology and to support mechanistic understanding in chemical risk assessment.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.