ReviewBone reports2026
Fracture risk assessment by dual-energy absorptiometry in osteogenesis imperfecta: A systematic review of measurement sites and its predictive value.
Review in Bone reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) suffer frequent fracturing of bones. Dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA) is considered a surrogate measure of bone strength, and DXA scans are usually acquired yearly to guide treatment. However, DXA provides only limited insight into bone strength as it does not account for bone geometry or microarchitecture. This systematic review outlines current clinical practice regarding the DXA in children with OI, and evaluates evidence for conventional and alternative DXA-derived measures in OI. The search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases at 12-Dec-2025 and records were screened by two reviewers. Studies presenting DXA measurement locations in children with OI or results on the relation between DXA-derived measures and OI type or fractures were eligible and presented in a descriptive manner. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. In total, 91 studies were included. Data was extracted from 38 observational studies including 3696 patients. The results showed that DXA measurement locations are not standardized. Although studies were variable in methods and results, the association between DXA-derived areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and fractures was generally weak - particularly when fracture incidence was evaluated over short time intervals. However, location-specific measurements may offer some improvement. DXA-based measures reflecting trabecular structure or estimated bone volume did not outperform aBMD. Given the presented results of conventional DXA in OI, alternative methods of bone strength assessment in patients with OI are needed. Assessment targeting fracture-prone skeletal regions and incorporating geometric properties may enhance DXA's predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.