Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326867›Full record

ArticleACS measurement science au2026

Rapid Classification of Coffee Varieties Using Single-Bean Hot Gas Extraction Ion-Mobility Spectrometry with Machine Learning.

Nathanael Aaron Prayoga, Chamarthi Maheswar Raju, Pawel L Urban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS measurement science au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nathanael Aaron PrayogaDepartment of Chemistry, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Rd., Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan.
Chamarthi Maheswar RajuDepartment of Chemistry, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Rd., Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan.
Pawel L UrbanDepartment of Chemistry, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Rd., Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3471-045X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coffee is consumed by over one billion people daily, creating a high risk of adulteration where premium varieties are blended with inferior fillers. While various analytical techniques exist, they are often expensive and require labor-intensive sample preparation, such as grinding and brewing. Here, we present a proof-of-concept of a non-destructive platform that integrates ion-mobility spectrometry with online hot-gas extraction for rapid classification of coffee varieties using single-bean samples. The integration of a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) model enables automated differentiation with 100% classification accuracy across four coffee bean varieties (Civet Arabica, Civet Robusta, carbonic maceration, and anaerobic fermentation natural) at an optimal bin width of 0.25 ms. When expanded to 10 diverse coffee bean varieties, the 1D CNN model achieved ∼92% independent test accuracy at a bin width of 0.10 ms. Furthermore, the system successfully monitored aroma degradation over 3 weeks and accurately predicted degradation patterns of anaerobic fermentation natural Arabica. Additionally, this 1D CNN model achieved 90% accuracy in predicting the presence of adulterants in coffee beans. Although the proposed method does not identify specific VOCs, the heuristic readouts it generates still enable rapid quality control and authenticity verification in commercial coffee beans.

Indexed as

adulterationcoffee beanmachine learningrapid analysisvolatilome

Identifiers

PMID42326867
PMCPMC13281198

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.