Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327345›Full record

ArticleData in brief2026

Survey on academic self-efficacy, academic stress, critical thinking, performance expectations, and students' AI dependency.

Quynh Pham Viet, Duy Van Nguyen, Nguyen Thi Xiem, Dat Ngoc Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Quynh Pham VietFaculty of Education, Hanoi Metropolitan University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Duy Van NguyenFaculty of Business Administration, Phenikaa University, Duong Noi, Hanoi 12116, Viet Nam.
Nguyen Thi XiemFaculty of Education, Hanoi Metropolitan University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Dat Ngoc NguyenForeign Trade University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of AI development, not only in business and society but also in education, students are increasingly using AI in their studies. This could become a concern due to the decline in critical thinking and the increased dependence on AI. This study focuses on academic self-Efficacy, academic stress, critical thinking, performance expectations, and Students' AI dependency. Data were collected from 1580 university students in Vietnam. The study examined the reliability and discriminant validity of the constructs using Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Indexed as

Academic self-efficacyAcademic stressAI dependencyCritical thinkingPerformance expectationsStudents

Identifiers

PMID42327345
PMCPMC13280133

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.