ArticleCJC open2026
Patients' Perspectives on Personalized Glycemic Targets for Coronary Artery Disease Prevention Based on the Haptoglobin Phenotype: A Qualitative Study.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent research reported that people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the haptoglobin (Hp) 2-2 phenotype had reduced coronary artery disease risk with aggressive glycemic targets. Those without the Hp2-2 phenotype did not have this reduction and actually faced increased mortality risk, indicating that using the Hp phenotype test to personalize glycemic targets may be warranted. We aimed to explore the perspectives of individuals with T2D on personalized glycemic targets based on the Hp phenotype test. Methods: In this qualitative descriptive study, we conducted semi-structured interviews that included 2 hypothetical scenarios about the Hp phenotype test with 25 Canadian adults with T2D between July and December 2024. Participants were purposively sampled, and interviews lasted 20-85 minutes. Inductive thematic analysis identified themes. Results: We identified 6 themes, as follows: (i) the Hp phenotype test could provide helpful new information; (ii) the test would not be inconvenient; (iii) test uptake would depend on characteristics of the healthcare provider and the accessibility of healthcare services; (iv) participants have fear that aggressive glycemic targets in the Hp2-2 phenotype may perpetuate stigma from healthcare providers and cause treatment burden; (v) motivation to use knowledge regarding the Hp2-2 phenotype to control blood sugar may be related to one's age, disease progression, and current glycemic target; and (vi) participants have uncertainty in how to use the information that they do not have the Hp2-2 phenotype in managing their T2D. Conclusions: People with T2D were receptive to the concept of the Hp phenotype test and described potential barriers that would need mitigation to optimize clinical utility of the test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.