ArticleAfrican journal of thoracic and critical care medicine2026
A comparative audit of endotracheal tube cuff pressures across three intensive care units at a tertiary South African academic hospital.
Article in African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endotracheal tube cuff pressures in intensive care - time for renewed attention.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In many intensive care units (ICUs), endotracheal intubation with cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) is a regular intervention in critically ill patients. Prolonged periods of intubation are common in this cohort of patients, so regular monitoring of the ETT cuff pressures is particularly important. Significant morbidity and mortality can be observed with under- and overinflation of the ETT cuff. Best practice guidelines suggest a safe ETT cuff pressure of 20 - 30 cm H Objectives: To measure and compare ETT cuff pressures in adult intubated patients across three ICUs: trauma, neurosurgical, and multidisciplinary (a multidisciplinary ICU is overseen by the same intensivist; however, it has two separate nursing staff contingents in adjacent wards, so data from this ICU were recorded as 'multidisciplinary team 1 (MDT 1) and multidisciplinary team 2 (MDT 2)') at a tertiary academic hospital, and compare the frequency at which ETT cuff pressures appeared outside the recommended range. The secondary objective was to assess the degree of under- or overinflation and determine whether ETT cuff pressures varied significantly based on the time of day the measurements were taken (morning, afternoon and evening). Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary Johannesburg academic hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Altogether, 300 ETT cuff pressure measurements were collected from 137 patients across the three ICUs. These measurements were done at three different times during the day, mornings, afternoons and evenings, using a standardised manometer. Results: Over 90% of the recorded ETT cuff pressures measured across the three ICUs were above the suggested optimal range of 20 - 30 cm H Conclusion: This study demonstrated a consistent trend of ETT cuff overinflation across all three ICUs, with almost all measurements significantly exceeding the recommended optimal range. No statistically significant differences in cuff pressures were observed based on the time of day the measurements were taken. Study synopsis:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.