ArticleVascular health and risk management2026
Assessment of Blood Pressure Control Among Hypertensive Patients Attending Primary Healthcare Settings in Qatar: A Retrospective Chart Review.
Article in Vascular health and risk management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) poses a significant threat to public health, contributing to increased all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.The study objectives were to assess BP control among hypertensive patients attending primary care centers in Qatar and to explore the association between patient-specific factors and BP control. Methods: A retrospective chart review from 2017 to 2020 was conducted across Qatar primary care centers. A sample size of 400 patients per year was chosen to be able to estimate the yearly proportion of patients achieving BP control (the primary outcome) to within a margin of error of at most 5% using 95% confidence interval. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between patient variables and BP control. Results: Among the 2,185 selected patients, over 60% of general hypertensive patients achieved BP control, (n=1226/1859, 66% in 2018), (n=1398/2038, 69% in 2019), and (n=1229/1897, 65% in 2020). More than 60% of diabetics or patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) reached target BP levels (n=882/1309, 67.4% in 2018), (n=1002/1402, 71.5% in 2019), and (n=878/1314, 66.8% in 2020). Gender, nationality (Qatari vs. non-Qatari), and presence of comorbidities like dyslipidemia, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation and CKD were found to significantly impact BP levels. Conclusion: This study suggests that over half of hypertensive patients in Qatar's primary care setting achieved controlled BP. Key predictors of BP control included Qatari nationality, dyslipidemia, and CHF. However, due to the inherent limitations of retrospective chart review methodology, these results should be interpreted judiciously. Future prospective studies are crucial to corroborate these predictors and inform the development of tailored strategies to overcome barriers for achieving optimal BP control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.