ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Evaluating AI-based mosquito monitoring technologies: a field study in Zhejiang Province, 2025.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of intelligent mosquito surveillance devices implemented in Zhejiang Province and to compare these metrics with those obtained from traditional surveillance methods. Methods: Intelligent surveillance devices, light traps, and BG-traps were operated concurrently at the same locations. Statistical comparisons were conducted using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's T3 tests, while the Dynamic Time Warping algorithm was employed to evaluate similarities in density trends. Results: A total of 278 trap-nights using light traps and 278 trap-hours of BG-traps captured 11,349 and 1,524 mosquitoes, respectively, yielding mean densities of 14.56 mosquitoes/(trap·night) and 6.34 mosquitoes/(trap-hour). Additionally, 991 and 646 trap-days of Chengwen Jingling traps and CAMMADE traps recorded 12,003 and 1,180 mosquitoes, respectively, based on backend data, with mean densities of 5.62 mosquitoes/(trap-day) and 1.83 mosquitoes/(trap-day). The light trap produced significantly higher mosquito densities than all other methods ( Conclusions: AI-based mosquito monitoring technologies exhibit significant potential for advancing vector surveillance; however, current technical limitations in trapping efficacy and algorithm accuracy necessitate a hybrid approach integrating AI with conventional methods in the near term, rather than a full replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.