SynthesisFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Impact of probiotic supplementation on salivary function, oral microbiota, and gut health: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Probiotics, which are classified as helpful living microorganisms, have demonstrated the ability to improve salivary function, inhibit pathogens like Streptococcus mutans, and modify the oral and gut microbiota. The aims of this systematic review was to assess their effects on salivary function, oral microbiota, and gut health. Methods: Literature search was done in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct and Cochrane were performed. Randomized controlled trials were included which involved human subjects receiving probiotic supplementation Outcomes assessed were salivary parameters (flow rate, buffering capacity, pH, biomarkers), oral microbiota changes, and gut health indicators. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (RoB 2.0) were performed independently by two reviewers. Due to heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not conducted. Results: A total of six systematic reviews were included in this review. Probiotic supplementation was associated with improvements in salivary parameters, including buffering capacity and plaque pH, and reductions in cariogenic bacteria such as Conclusions: Probiotics have been shown to provide modest, strain-specific benefits for modulating the oral microbiota and certain salivary parameters, with more precise molecular and clinical evidence for gut effects. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251243347, identifier CRD420251243347.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.