Evidence mapPaperPMID 42328195Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2026

Sample size calculation for training ensemble machine learning models on health data.

Nicholas Mitsakakis, Dan Liu, Thomas Walters, Khaled El Emam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas MitsakakisCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Dan LiuCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Thomas WaltersDivision of Gastroenterology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Khaled El EmamCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health research studies often suffer from small sample sizes, and training machine learning (ML) models requires large datasets. There is a dearth of literature on determining the adequate sample size for using ML models. We developed an empirically derived sample size calculator for ensemble ML models: random forests and two gradient-boosted decision trees (light gradient boosting machine [LGBM] and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]). This predicts the sample size required to achieve a pre-defined level of prognostic performance with a certain probability. Prognostic performance is defined as the sample area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC) relative to the optimal model trained on the full (population) dataset. Our calculator's accuracy was compared to three common heuristics and a statistical approach to sample size calculation. For example, the median relative error sample size prediction was 25% to achieve 85% of the optimal performance with 90% certainty for LGBM. Our model has significantly better accuracy than other methods for tree-based ensemble ML models.

Indexed as

sample size calculation

Identifiers

PMID42328195
PMCPMC13280678

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.