ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2026
Enhancing skin-implant integration in lower-limb transcutaneous prostheses: From interface biology to bioactive, antimicrobial and cell-based strategies.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging mechanisms and translational advances in musculoskeletal diseases.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcutaneous prosthetic systems, which directly connect an external limb prosthesis to the skeleton, offer substantial biomechanical and clinical advantages over conventional socket-based devices. By eliminating the soft tissue loading inherent to the socket interfaces, these systems enable improved load transfer, comfort, and more natural sensory feedback through direct skeletal attachment. However, their widespread clinical adoption remains limited by complications at the skin-implant interface, including infection, marsupialization, and epithelial down-growth.Advances in surface engineering, particularly nanoscale modifications, have demonstrated a critical capacity to both promote host cell adhesion and direct macrophage polarization, thereby addressing epithelial sealing and chronic inflammation. Bioactive coatings incorporating extracellular matrix proteins or adhesion peptides have been designed to replicate dermal-epidermal interactions and reinforce epithelial anchorage. In parallel, antimicrobial strategies employing antibiotics, peptides, or metal-based coatings have been developed to counteract bacterial colonization of the stoma. Moreover, cell-based therapies using fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells have shown promise in supporting dermal integration and modulating local inflammation. Despite these advances, durable and infection-resistant skin-implant integration remains unresolved, indicating that long-term clinical success will require integrated, multifunctional interfaces capable of simultaneously supporting soft-tissue sealing, infection control, immunomodulation and mechanical stability. The translational potential of this article: The development of transcutaneous prostheses designed to enhance skin-implant integration in lower-limb amputees holds substantial translational promises, with implications that extend from individual patient outcomes to broader healthcare systems and biomedical innovation pipelines. Although osseointegrated prosthetic systems have demonstrated improved mobility and enhanced comfort, compared with traditional socket-based devices, their widespread clinical adoption remains limited by complications at the percutaneous interface. Addressing these challenges through bio-hybrid interface creates a realistic pathway toward an infection-resistant and durable skin attachment.From a translational perspective, this strategy is gaining increasing interests due to its practical feasibility: several of its core elements, including surface-modified titanium, antimicrobial coatings, and bioactive agents, are supported by existing regulatory pathways. This enables stepwise innovation within well-defined approval frameworks without the need to create entirely new regulatory categories.Next-generation implants could build upon clinically accepted materials while incorporating advanced surface functionalities that promote epithelial sealing, dermal integration, and controlled immune modulation. Smart, bioresponsive surfaces capable of releasing antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory agents in response to bacterial colonization further strengthen the clinical value proposition by directly addressing infection risk, one of the primary causes of implant failure and revision surgery. Reducing these complications, improving the biological seal at the skin-implant junction, is not merely a solution to a complication: it is an initial enabling technology for the next generation of smart prostheses, that would integrate sensors and neural communication systems, and decrease long-term healthcare costs associated with hospitalizations, antibiotic therapy, and surgical revisions, thereby reducing the overall cost of healthcare system.Successful clinical translation will depend on multidisciplinary collaboration, robust preclinical modelling of the skin interface, and carefully designed clinical trials that evaluate both biological integration and functional outcomes. Enhanced skin-implant integration could shift transcutaneous prostheses from a niche intervention to a broadly adopted standard of care, redefining long-term rehabilitation strategies for individuals living with limb loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.