ReviewInternational journal of biological sciences2026
Esophageal Small Cell Carcinoma: From Bench Discoveries to Bedside Therapeutics.
Review in International journal of biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is both rare and aggressive. Lacking its own guidelines, it has historically been managed with treatment models borrowed from small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, advances in multi-omics and immunology are beginning to uncover distinct molecular and immune features in SCCE. These include frequent alterations in NOTCH1 and PTEN, ASCL1 and NEUROD1 transcriptional programs, and a highly adaptive immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Together, they point to unique biological traits that may be targetable. Clinically, conventional chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery are being reassessed, with neoadjuvant therapy showing increasing value. Mechanism-driven strategies such as anti-angiogenic and DLL3-targeted therapies are under active exploration. At the same time, emerging biomarkers and multimodal predictive models are offering new tools for risk stratification and personalized management. Yet pathology adds further challenges: boundaries between SCCE, squamous cell or adenocarcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation, and mixed or collision tumors remain blurred, creating diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty. These challenges highlight an important shift-SCCE is no longer a clinical "black box" but rather a frontier that demands resolution through a translational lens. By realigning fragmented basic research with clinical evidence, this review not only presents a comprehensive picture of SCCE but also aims to provide clear therapeutic direction for this malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.