Articlenpj health systems2026
TimeX: Phenotype Onset Extraction from Clinical Narratives.
Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disease phenotype onset is critical for timely and accurate diagnosis and clinical decision-making, yet it remains poorly characterized in the literature. Estimating phenotype onset using electronic health record (EHR) data holds promise but remains challenging. Researchers often resort to EHR documentation timestamps as proxies for phenotype onset, which can be inaccurate. Conventional natural language processing (NLP) approaches suffer from limited scalability and generalizability, and struggle to interpret implicit or vague temporal expressions. To address these gaps, we introduce TimeX, a novel open-source pipeline that leverages Llama-3.1, using instruction-based prompting for extracting phenotype onset from clinical narratives. TimeX employs a modular workflow comprising family history filtering, phenotype extraction, negation handling, and temporal information extraction to estimate phenotype onset. It yielded an average accuracy of 81.24% in timestamp extraction using 102 manually annotated clinical notes from the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, substantially outperforming all five baselines by at least 14.86%. A case study of four rare disease cohorts revealed that narrative-derived phenotype onset is more precise than that based on documentation timestamps. TimeX supports accurate and scalable phenotype onset extraction, with the potential to enable more precise disease trajectory characterization and timely disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.