ArticleKidney international reports2026
Kidney Transplant Candidates With High Frequency Deceased Donor Offers.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Changes in organ allocation and regulatory policy have led to significant expansion of deceased donor kidney offers for transplantation in the United States. Transplant rates have increased, however inefficiencies in allocation have also evolved including increased donor kidney nonutilization, resources, and complication rates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of deceased donor kidney offers in the United States with the Scientific Registry Of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2024 using multivariable logistic and negative binomial models. Results: There were 7,608,578 donor kidney offers to 205,780 candidates with an average 19.4 months follow-up on the waiting list. The median offer per candidate was 17 (interquartile range: 6-46); however 28% of offers ( Conclusion: Results indicate that organ offers are disproportionately explained by a minority of candidates. Efforts to identify reasons for repetitive offer declines, strategic use of offer filters, and transition of applicable candidates to inactive status may dramatically improve the efficiency of deceased donor kidney allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.