ArticleKidney medicine2026
Implementation of the AAMATES Platform as a National Registry for Stage 5 CKD in Mexico.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a major public health challenge in Mexico. Despite this burden, no national registry exists, hindering an accurate understanding of the disease. This study sought to characterize patients with stage 5 CKD using the Administration and Management Environment for Health Services (AAMATES) digital platform and assess its potential as a national registry model. Study Design: A cross-sectional observational registry collected demographic and clinical data for stage 5 CKD through the AAMATES platform. Setting & Population: Patients treated between January and December 2023 at hospitals and institutes affiliated with Mexico's Coordinating Commission of National Institutes of Health and High-Specialty Hospitals (CCINSHAE) were included. The registry captured 969 patients; mean age was 49.8 years and 56% were male. Exposures or Predictors: The main etiologies of CKD were type 2 diabetes mellitus (37.1%) and unknown causes (23.1%). Initial renal replacement therapy (RRT) was also documented: hemodialysis in 55%, peritoneal dialysis in 38%, preemptive transplant in 2%, and no RRT in 5%. Additional variables included residual urine volume and laboratory values (creatinine, hemoglobin, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, and albumin). Outcomes: Outcomes comprised the distribution and intensity of RRT, residual urine output, biochemical parameters, time from CKD diagnosis to registry entry, and whether patients had been evaluated by a nephrologist. Analytical Approach: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the collected data, presented as frequencies, means ± standard deviations, and medians with interquartile ranges. Results: Among 537 patients receiving hemodialysis, 71% received ≤2 sessions per week; and among 365 patients receiving peritoneal dialysis, 32% received intermittent peritoneal dialysis. Residual urine volumes of 100-500 mL/d were observed in 46.6% of participants; the median time from CKD diagnosis to registry entry was 282 days, and 14% had not been evaluated by a nephrologist at diagnosis. Limitations: The registry is voluntary, is limited to stage 5 CKD, lacks data on time since diagnosis for nearly half of participants, and includes only CCINSHAE hospitals, excluding other major Mexican health care systems. Conclusions: AAMATES demonstrates CCINSHAE's effort to map advanced CKD. Making this registry mandatory could enable robust epidemiological monitoring and targeted public health strategies to lessen Mexico's CKD burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.