ArticleProteomics2026
Optimized Sample Handling Minimizes Peptide Adsorption to Plastics to Enable High Sensitivity Evosep Based Chemical Proteomics.
Article in Proteomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemical proteomics approaches often yield low peptide recovery because they aim to enrich low-abundance proteins. Poor sample handling further reduces recovery through peptide adsorption to plastic surfaces and losses due to vacuum evaporation. We systematically mapped these losses across buffers, volumes, plastics and pH, then developed an Evotip-compatible handling protocol that minimizes adsorption and removes the need for vacuum evaporation. Losses to plastic adsorption and vacuum evaporation were most apparent at low inputs (< 200 ng) and with larger volumes (> 20 µL) but were also dependent on acidification as well as the buffer and plastic used. The optimized workflow: direct acidification of peptides, frozen storage if needed, and direct loading onto Evotips, resulted in up to ∼90-fold gains versus workflows incorporating vacuum concentration steps, a common practice in proteomics sample preparation, when peptide input was limited to 10 ng. This optimized sample handling method enables high-throughput chemical proteomics by reducing manual handling steps and enables the characterization of low abundance proteins previously lost during sample preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.