ReviewRheumatology international2026
Kinesio taping in knee osteoarthritis: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and rehabilitation implementations.
Review in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kinesio taping is widely used as a non-pharmacological adjunct in knee osteoarthritis (OA), although its mechanisms and clinical value remain debated. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on kinesio taping in knee OA, addressing mechanisms and effects on pain, function, muscle activation, proprioception, and range of motion (ROM). PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Google Scholar were searched through 19 May 2026 using MeSH terms "Osteoarthritis, Knee" and "Athletic Tape" with related keywords. Eligible sources included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and appraised qualitatively with interpretive weight ranked by study design. Kinesio taping may provide short-term pain reductions that fall below minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (15-20 mm VAS). Functional gains are modest and inconsistent, mostly below WOMAC MCID (17%). Although kinesio taping does not increase muscle strength, it may modulate quadriceps-hamstring coactivation and neuromuscular control during low-load tasks. Proprioceptive gains are reportedly angle-specific (significant at 15° and 30°). Flexion ROM increases modestly, whereas extension changes little. Compared with other adjunctive treatments, it shows lower or comparable effects. Adverse effects are confined to minor, self-limiting skin reactions. Current evidence does not support the routine use of kinesio taping as a standalone treatment for knee OA. Kinesio taping may be considered as a short-term adjunct to exercise and education in selected patients, as it may facilitate symptom relief, sensory feedback, and low-load activity. Methodological heterogeneity remains a significant limitation, and randomized controlled trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.