ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2026
[More than just technology: autonomous AI in ophthalmological care].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) systems are finding their way into ophthalmological care, particularly in imaging diagnostics (fundus photographs, OCT) and screening set-ups; however, the term "autonomous" is used inconsistently in routine clinical practice: in addition to fully automated systems (AI only decisions), care services are emerging in which doctors make the diagnosis but there is no direct doctor-patient contact (asynchronous diagnosis). These forms are ethically relevant because responsibilities, duties of disclosure, trust and the consequences of errors are different from those in a traditional consultation. This article categorizes autonomous care concepts, outlines potential clinical benefits and discusses key ethical and regulatory issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42329385What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.