Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42329652›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Long-Term Resistance Training and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes.

Tianyue Zhang, Yiwen Zhang, Dong Hoon Lee, Leandro F M Rezende, Xinyu Wang, Chao Zheng, Edward Giovannucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tianyue ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yiwen ZhangDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dong Hoon LeeDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Leandro F M RezendeChronic Disease Epidemiology Research Center, Department of Preventive Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Xinyu WangDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chao ZhengDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Edward GiovannucciDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The optimal long-term patterns of resistance training, including volume, consistency, and integration with other lifestyle behaviors, remain unclear. Objective: To examine the association of long-term resistance training with risk of incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) and to assess joint associations with aerobic physical activity and sedentary behavior. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study assessed the data from 3 ongoing US studies: the Nurses' Health Study (June 30, 2002, to June 30, 2021), the Nurses' Health Study II (June 30, 2003, to June 30, 2021), and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (June 30, 1992, to June 30, 2021). Follow-up was completed June 30, 2021. Participants included adult health care professionals who had undergone at least 3 assessments of resistance training between 40 and 60 years of age for trajectory analysis. Data were analyzed from April 30 to September 30, 2025. Exposure: Time spent in resistance training was assessed every 2 to 4 years and categorized into 5 groups: consistently low, high to low, low to high, fluctuating, and consistently high. Long-term resistance training was characterized using cumulative means and trajectory patterns between ages 40 and 60 years in the Nurses' Health Study II. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was incident T2D. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-varying resistance training. Results: Among 143 715 adults included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 56.0 [10.5] years; 78.3% women), 10 038 incident T2D cases occurred during a mean (SD) follow-up of 19.2 (5.0) years. Compared with no resistance training, engaging in 2 or more hours per week of resistance training was associated with a lower T2D risk (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.66-0.81). In trajectory analyses, participants with consistently high levels of resistance training (≥0.5 h/wk across midlife) had a 42% lower T2D risk (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.74), and a low to high pattern was associated with a 21% lower risk (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.94), compared with consistently low levels of resistance training. Participants who met recommendations for both aerobic activity (≥15 total metabolic equivalent h/wk) and resistance training (≥1 h/wk) and limited television viewing (<2 h/d) had the lowest T2D risk (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.34-0.42) compared with those meeting none of the recommendations. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective cohort study, resistance training among US adult health care professionals was associated with substantially lower T2D risk, particularly when performed consistently over midlife and combined with adequate aerobic activity and limited sedentary television viewing. These findings support the inclusion of resistance training as a key component of lifestyle recommendations for diabetes prevention.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Resistance TrainingAdultExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSedentary BehaviorUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42329652
PMCPMC13288573

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.