ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Snakes and snakebites in the munduruku cosmology and medicine, central Brazilian Amazonia.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Snakebite envenoming is a major public health problem in the Amazon, disproportionately affecting Indigenous populations with high incidence and mortality rates. Efforts to decentralize antivenom treatment to remote areas require not only logistical adaptations, but also a deeper understanding of Indigenous medical systems to enable culturally appropriate care. This study aimed to construct an explanatory model of snakebites from the perspective of the Munduruku people, an Indigenous group in the Central Brazilian Amazon. We conducted a qualitative study based on in-depth interviews with nineteen traditional healers. Our methodological orientation follows the Amerindian perspectivism theory. Data was sorted into five relevant categories: 1) Participants' identities; 2) Snakes and snakebites; 3) Course of sickness; and 4) Therapeutic resources in the Munduruku medicine. Munduruku healers interpret snakebites as events involving both natural and supernatural dimensions, integrating bodily, social, and spiritual factors. Snakes are perceived as intentional beings, and envenomation may result not only from physical encounters but also from sorcery or transgression of social norms; perceived severity is shaped by the type of snake, adherence to dietary and sexual restrictions, and spiritual causality. Therapeutic practices predominantly involve topical preparations, rituals, and symbolic interventions embedded within broader relational and cosmological frameworks. Despite these distinct explanatory models, most participants recognized the importance of biomedical care, particularly for severe cases, and did not oppose referral to hospital-based treatment, while Indigenous healing practices remain central throughout the therapeutic itinerary. Improving snakebite outcomes in the Amazon requires intercultural health strategies that integrate biomedical and Indigenous systems, with symmetrical partnerships with Indigenous healers being essential to ensure timely access to antivenom while respecting local knowledge and practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.