ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Individual differences in speech monitoring: Functional and structural correlates of delayed auditory feedback.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensory feedback is essential for the fine-tuning of motor actions, and speech production is no exception. It depends on continuous self-monitoring to ensure that produced sounds match intended targets. Delaying auditory feedback (DAF) disrupts this alignment and impairs fluency, providing a powerful tool to investigate sensorimotor control. We combined functional and diffusion-weighted MRI in 31 participants performing a word-production task under delayed (DAF) and immediate (no-DAF) auditory feedback. While all participants slowed their speech under DAF, the extent of this effect varied across individuals and was quantified using a susceptibility index. At the group level, DAF > no-DAF elicited increased activation in a right-lateralized network encompassing the superior temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, supplementary motor area, and left cerebellum. Incorporating individual differences revealed that higher susceptibility was associated with greater activation in left-hemisphere speech motor homologues and larger volume of the right long segment of the arcuate fasciculus, a whitematter pathway connecting auditory and motor speech regions. This pattern suggests that susceptibility reflects increased recruitment of neural resources and a stronger reliance on auditory-motor coupling. In contrast, resilience was associated with greater engagement of the bilateral angular gyrus and higher fiber density in the right posterior AF, which connects auditory and somatosensory speech regions. This finding indicates that resilience is supported by a posterior temporo-parietal circuit that efficiently integrates multimodal sensory feedback. Together, these findings link functional dynamics with underlying structural connectivity to reveal how a right-lateralized network supports speech control, while accounting for individual differences in susceptibility to fluency disruption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.