ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2026
Integrating social determinants of health and genetic risk in disease risk models.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex diseases are shaped by heritable factors and non-genetic environmental, behavioral, and social determinants of health, but these are rarely modeled together. The growing availability of large-scale, multimodal biobanks creates new opportunities to integrate diverse data types into more accurate disease risk models. Here, we apply multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) to over 100 environmental, behavioral, and social variables from the All of Us biobank (n = 413,457 individuals) to generate low-dimensional embeddings that quantify non-genetic risk for six common chronic conditions: asthma, chronic kidney disease, coronary heart disease, hypercholesterolemia, prostate cancer, and breast cancer. These embeddings recovered known risk factors such as economic status and smoking but also pointed to others such as loneliness and spirituality. Including MCA axes in addition to demographics and polygenic scores (PGSs) consistently improved disease-risk prediction, with improvement in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ΔROC-AUC) ranging from 0.007 to 0.027. For four of six diseases, the gains in model predictive power from MCA embeddings surpassed those attributable to PGS. Genetic and non-genetic risks combined additively, with little evidence of interaction effects (ΔROC-AUC ≤ 0.001) and highly stable variant effect sizes when embeddings were included in genetic association models (r > 0.98). In summary, we introduce a scalable, interpretable framework that summarizes survey-based environmental, behavioral, and social factors without prior assumptions about disease-specific variables. Our results demonstrate that these non-genetic contexts improve prediction but show limited evidence of interaction with genome-wide polygenic disease risk. Our results underscore the importance of incorporating social, behavioral, and environmental factors into clinical models of disease risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.