Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42331584›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Sarah Mitchell, Jacqueline Birtwistle, Aaishah Javeed, Jude Beng, Lisa Hulbert, Carole A Paley, Emilie Couchman, Paola Cocco, Matthew Allsop, Justin Aunger and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sarah MitchellAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Science, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK S.Mitchell2@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1477-7860
Jacqueline BirtwistleAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Science, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6083-589X
Aaishah JaveedAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Science, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Jude BengAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Science, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, PPIE Co-Author, Leeds, UK.
Lisa HulbertAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Science, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, PPIE Co-Author, Leeds, UK.
Carole A PaleyAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Science, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6335-2666
Emilie CouchmanAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Science, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5157-0431
Paola CoccoAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Matthew AllsopAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Science, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7399-0194
Justin AungerDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-4570
Edward WebbAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-839X
Bryony DawkinsAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-1975
Fliss E M MurtaghWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, UK, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1289-3726
Catherine EvansKing's College London, Bessemer Road, London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation, London, England, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0034-7402
Lucy ZieglerAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Science, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAvoidable and unfair variation in access to palliative care exists for different groups of people and communities. Primary and community care teams deliver most palliative care and care to people at the end of life at home but the quality of care provided is variable. This is an under-researched area and receives little attention in service design and policy. This study will investigate the key contexts, resources and components required for an integrated approach to palliative care to deliver improved and more equitable outcomes for patients and carers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods study adopts a realist methodological approach, and comprises four work packages:A multi-perspective mixed-methods study to understand patient preferences and priorities in palliative care, prioritising recruitment of patients and family members/carers from areas of socioeconomic deprivation. Data collection will comprise: (1) qualitative interviews, (2) review of patient case notes and (3) a discrete choice experiment. Realist analysis will result in the development of theory based on the identification of the key contexts and underlying mechanisms required to achieve beneficial outcomes through an integrated approach to palliative care.A realist evaluation of existing integrated models of palliative care will involve theory-refining interviews and theory-consolidating focus groups with professionals working in three different service areas.Dynamic simulation modelling of the healthcare resources needed to deliver the proposed integrated approach, ensuring quality and equity.The theoretical and economic modelling will be tested out at two expert stakeholder workshops to determine the key enablers to implementation in practice. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: The study design was informed by patient and public involvement (PPI) with 16 patients and members of the public from diverse and socioeconomically deprived communities for 12 months in a National Institute for Health and Care Research-funded palliative care partnership. PPI will be continuous throughout the study, prioritising inclusivity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service Research Ethics Committee 2, on 20 August 2025 (IRAS ID: 354755) and Health Research Authority approval on 1 October 2025. The targeted dissemination strategy will include outputs and resources for key audiences including patients and families, professionals in primary care and specialist palliative care and service commissioners. The results will inform service delivery to reduce inequities and optimise the use of finite resources to maximise impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: The study is registered with the ISRCTN UK Clinical Study Registry: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN61092011.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesPalliative CarePrimary Health CareHumansPatient PreferenceQualitative ResearchResearch DesignHealth inequitiesHealth ServicesPalliative CarePrimary Health CareTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID42331584
PMCPMC13289175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.