Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42331786›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2026

Linking electric field directionality to treatment outcome in OCD: Insights from patient-specific tDCS modeling.

Julie Gosez, Arnaud Germaneau, Karim El Houari, Prasanth Bokam, Michel Rochette, Nicolas Langbour, Rémy Guillevin, Nemat Jaafari, Ghina Harika-Germaneau

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julie GosezInstitut Pprime, UPR 3346, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France. julie.gosez@univ-poitiers.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6330-6379
Arnaud GermaneauInstitut Pprime, UPR 3346, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Karim El HouariAnsys France, Villeurbanne, France.
Prasanth BokamAnsys France, Villeurbanne, France.
Michel RochetteAnsys France, Villeurbanne, France.
Nicolas LangbourCentre de recherches sur la cognition et l'apprentissage, CNRS 7295, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Rémy GuillevinCHU de Poitiers, Service de Radiologie, Poitiers, France.
Nemat JaafariCentre de recherches sur la cognition et l'apprentissage, CNRS 7295, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Ghina Harika-GermaneauCentre de recherches sur la cognition et l'apprentissage, CNRS 7295, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), yet clinical outcomes remain inconsistent. To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying therapeutic variability, we conducted a patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling study of electric fields (EF) induced by tDCS in OCD patients. Forty-two patients from a double-blind, randomized clinical trial received active tDCS with the cathode over the pre-supplementary motor area and the anode over the right supraorbital region. Clinical response was assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and responders were defined as those achieving ≥35% score reduction. Individual head models were created using SimNIBS, and current density directionality (

Indexed as

Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderPatient-Specific ModelingPrefrontal CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Effect HeterogeneityTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42331786
PMCPMC13538639

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.