Evidence mapPaperPMID 42331999Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Feasibility and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of adolescent depression in a naturalistic inpatient setting: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Franziska Martin, Hannah Brauer, Alexander Prehn-Kristensen, Julia Siemann, Martin Holtmann, Tanja Legenbauer, Michael Siniatchkin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Franziska MartinLWL University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. Franziska.martin@rub.de.
Hannah BrauerInstitute for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Centre for Integrative Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Christian-Albrecht University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Alexander Prehn-KristensenInstitute for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Centre for Integrative Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Christian-Albrecht University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Julia SiemannDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Bethel, Evangelical Hospital Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Martin HoltmannLWL University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Tanja Legenbauer *LWL University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Michael Siniatchkin *University Clinic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has potential as a treatment for adult depression, but its effectiveness in adolescents remains unexplored. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of tDCS in young in-patients with depression. In a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, 34 adolescent in-patients (mean age 15.48 years) received ten sessions of either tDCS or sham stimulation over two weeks, alongside standard treatment. Depression severity, quality of life, emotional and behavioral issues, and executive functions were assessed before, immediately after, and two weeks post-treatment. The results indicated that tDCS was feasible and well-tolerated, with 28 patients completing at least eight sessions. Side effects were reported in nearly half of the sessions (45% sham, 48% tDCS), primarily mild to moderate, and no sessions were interrupted due to discomfort. Both groups experienced significant improvements in depressive symptoms and high treatment satisfaction, but no significant differences were found between the tDCS and sham groups. In conclusion, while tDCS appears to be a safe treatment option for adolescents with depression, this study could not show it to be superior to sham treatment. Further research with greater statistical power is needed to control for covariates.

Indexed as

DepressionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdolescentDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAdolescentsDepressionFeasibilityTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42331999
PMCPMC13287699

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.