ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026
Urolithiasis in patients with cancer.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urolithiasis is increasingly common, with rising rates driven by obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Patients with cancer have additional, unique risks of stone formation owing to effects on fluid and electrolyte balance, systemic cancer therapies, tumour lysis syndrome and anatomical alterations after urinary diversion or nephrectomy. Moreover, urolithiasis itself has been linked to increased rates of renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma and bladder cancer, potentially mediated by chronic inflammation, recurrent infections and shared metabolic or environmental factors. Management in this setting is complex and must be individualized. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy achieves the highest stone-free rates in patients with altered urinary tract anatomy, whereas retrograde intrarenal surgery and shock wave lithotripsy have more selective roles. Preventive strategies focus on thorough metabolic evaluation, hydration optimization and addressing cancer-specific risk factors such as hypercalcaemia, acidosis and chronic urinary stasis. Despite these insights, data on the epidemiology, mechanistic underpinnings and optimal management of urolithiasis in patients with cancer remain limited. Prospective studies are needed to clarify causal relationships, refine preventive strategies and develop evidence-based treatment algorithms for this growing and complex population.
Identifiers
42332111What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.