Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332170›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2026

Impact of Post-exposure Prophylaxis on Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Initiation Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Nested Case-control Study.

Ruzhuo Liu, Peilong Li, Lin Ge, Meizhen Liao, Xin Song, Yong Fu, Houlin Tang, Dongmin Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruzhuo LiuDivision of Epidemiology, National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0168-9989
Peilong LiDivision of Epidemiology, National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Lin GeDivision of Epidemiology, National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Meizhen LiaoShandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan, China.
Xin SongQingdao Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, China.
Yong FuQingdao Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, China.
Houlin TangDivision of Epidemiology, National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Dongmin LiDivision of Epidemiology, National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China. lidongmin@chinaaids.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-9473

Funding

National Major Science and Technology Projects of China 2017ZX10201101-002-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is considered a gate way to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), prospective evidence remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the association between PEP experience and subsequent PrEP initiation. A nested case-control study was conducted within a prospective cohort of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Qingdao, China. Cases were participants newly initiating PrEP, matched to four controls selected from participants who were at risk of initiating PrEP at the exact time the case occurred. The primary exposure was self-reported baseline PEP use, classified as never, ever, or recent use. Supplementary analyses examined PEP use at the visit immediately preceding PrEP initiation. A dichotomous exposure categorization grouping strategy was also applied across the above analysis (combining ever and recent users). Conditional Logistic regression estimated associations between PEP and PrEP initiation. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the potential effect modification. A total of 59 cases and 234 matched controls were included. Baseline PEP experience was not significantly associated with subsequent PrEP initiation (ever use: aOR = 1.79, 95%CI: 0.86-3.69, P = 0.117; recent use: aOR = 1.52, 95%CI: 0.46-4.99, P = 0.488). This lack of a significant association persisted when ever and recent PEP users were combined into a single "prior use" category (aOR = 1.72, 95%CI: 0.88-3.35, P = 0.110). However, subgroup analyses showed that among participants who report recent recreational drug use, those with a history of PEP use were more likely to initiate PrEP (aOR = 2.25, 95%CI: 1.09-4.64, P = 0.029). These findings suggest that to effectively leverage PEP encounters as a gateway to sustained prevention, health systems should prioritize and intensify linkage interventions for high-risk groups identified during the PEP consultation, particularly individuals who use substances. Transforming PEP encounters into opportunities for tailored intervention can strengthen the HIV prevention cascade for those most in need.

Indexed as

HIV preventionLinkage to careMen who have sex with menPost-exposure prophylaxisPre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID42332170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.