Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332236›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

MammoDenseSegNet: A Context-Aware Deep Learning Model for Dense Tissue Segmentation in Digital Mammograms.

Razieh Ganjee, Andriy Bandos, Md Belayat Hossain, Tamerlan Mustafaev, Margarita Zuley, Juhun Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Razieh GanjeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15237, USA.
Andriy BandosDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15237, USA.
Md Belayat HossainComputer Science Department, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA.
Tamerlan MustafaevDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15237, USA.
Margarita ZuleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15237, USA.
Juhun LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15237, USA. leej15@upmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-0540

Funding

NIH HHS R37-CA248207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast density is a breast cancer risk factor. The accurate quantification of breast density requires reliable segmentation of dense tissue in mammograms, but it is a challenging task due to large variations in tissue appearance across hospitals and imaging devices. We propose MammoDenseSegNet, a new deep encoder-decoder convolutional neural network designed to enhance segmentation performance through two complementary modules: a) Adaptive dual attention module, which captures long-range spatial and channel interdependencies to provide focused attention on relevant dense tissue areas regardless of their location; and b) Multi kernel receptive field module, which enlarges the network's receptive field at the bottleneck layer to aggregate multi-scale contextual features. Additionally, a multi-scale dice loss with deep supervision guides learning across decoder levels to improve robustness. We evaluated MammoDenseSegNet on two public digital mammogram datasets (VinDR-Mammo and EMBED) and one private dataset, spanning a variety of breast densities and imaging artifacts in a total of 1499 images from 606 women. Statistical analysis was done using generalized linear models accounting for correlation among images from the same women and adjusting for potential confounders (proc genmod, proc mixed, SAS v.9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). MammoDenseSegNet demonstrated consistently high performance across various conditions (with Recall ranging from 0.64 to 0.90 and Dice from 0.63 to 0.91) and significantly (p < 0.001) outperformed the publicly available state-of-the-art algorithm based on the VGG16 (with Recall from 0.04 to 0.91 and Dice from 0.06 to 0.82 across the same conditions). The improvement was largest for low-density tissue, where the baseline algorithm practically fails (with the mean Recall of 0.14 and Dice of 0.16) while MammoDenseSegNet remained clinically useful (with the mean Recall of 0.66 and Dice of 0.63).

Indexed as

BI-RADS densityBreast cancer risk assessmentBreast density segmentationDeep Learning

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.