Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332308›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

Deep learning for intraoperative recognition of critical structures in total hysterectomy.

Yuri Jonouchi, Saki Tanimoto, Kenbun Sone, Yusuke Toyohara, Kohei Yamaguchi, Yoshiko Kawata, Harunori Honjoh, Tomohiko Fukuda, Ayumi Taguchi, Yuichiro Miyamoto and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yuri Jonouchi *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Saki Tanimoto *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenbun SoneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. ksone5274@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7218-6401
Yusuke ToyoharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kohei YamaguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiko KawataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Harunori HonjohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiko FukudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Ayumi TaguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichiro MiyamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki IriyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mayuyo Mori-UchinoTokyo Metropolitan Center and Infection Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuhi OtaniAnaut Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Risa MiyagawaAnaut Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu Wada-HiraikeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsutoshi OdaDivision of Integrative Genomics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Miyuki HaradaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka OsugaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi HirotaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based surgical navigation system capable of recognizing the ureter, uterine artery, and bladder-uterine dissection plane during minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

methodsAn artificial intelligence (AI) model was developed at the University of Tokyo Hospital using videos of prior surgeries. Surgical videos of 27 laparoscopic or robot-assisted total hysterectomies were used to create training and validation datasets, with an additional set of cases serving as an independent test set. Key frames were manually annotated to train segmentation models for the ureter and uterine artery. A separate model visualized loose connective tissue fibers (LCTF) to aid in recognizing the bladder-uterine peritoneal dissection plane. Quantitative performance was assessed using standard segmentation metrics, and a qualitative evaluation was conducted by nine gynecologic surgeons using predefined scoring criteria.

resultsThe segmentation models achieved moderate quantitative performance, with Dice similarity coefficients of approximately 0.51 for the ureter and 0.45 for the uterine artery. In contrast, qualitative evaluation demonstrated favorable clinical interpretability. The mean recognition scores assigned by nine expert surgeons were 4.12 for the ureter and 3.45 for the uterine artery on a five-point scale, indicating that most structures were recognized clearly with only minor misrecognition. For bladder dissection, visualization of connective tissue fibers enabled identification of the correct dissection plane in the majority of evaluated frames; more than 70-80% of connective tissue was recognizable in most frames, and substantial misrecognition was uncommon.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that a deep learning-based system can recognize three key elements of a total hysterectomy: the ureter, the uterine artery, and the bladder-uterine dissection plane. Despite modest quantitative metrics, qualitative assessments indicated strong clinical utility. These findings establish a foundation for an integrated AI-assisted surgical navigation platform to enhance the safety and standardization of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHysterectomySurgery, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreterUrinary BladderUterine ArteryUterusArtificial intelligenceDeep learningHysterectomyUreter, uterine artery

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.