ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Deep learning for intraoperative recognition of critical structures in total hysterectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Assisted Recognition of Actual Ureteral and Pancreatic Injuries in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Video Review Study.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based surgical navigation system capable of recognizing the ureter, uterine artery, and bladder-uterine dissection plane during minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
methodsAn artificial intelligence (AI) model was developed at the University of Tokyo Hospital using videos of prior surgeries. Surgical videos of 27 laparoscopic or robot-assisted total hysterectomies were used to create training and validation datasets, with an additional set of cases serving as an independent test set. Key frames were manually annotated to train segmentation models for the ureter and uterine artery. A separate model visualized loose connective tissue fibers (LCTF) to aid in recognizing the bladder-uterine peritoneal dissection plane. Quantitative performance was assessed using standard segmentation metrics, and a qualitative evaluation was conducted by nine gynecologic surgeons using predefined scoring criteria.
resultsThe segmentation models achieved moderate quantitative performance, with Dice similarity coefficients of approximately 0.51 for the ureter and 0.45 for the uterine artery. In contrast, qualitative evaluation demonstrated favorable clinical interpretability. The mean recognition scores assigned by nine expert surgeons were 4.12 for the ureter and 3.45 for the uterine artery on a five-point scale, indicating that most structures were recognized clearly with only minor misrecognition. For bladder dissection, visualization of connective tissue fibers enabled identification of the correct dissection plane in the majority of evaluated frames; more than 70-80% of connective tissue was recognizable in most frames, and substantial misrecognition was uncommon.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that a deep learning-based system can recognize three key elements of a total hysterectomy: the ureter, the uterine artery, and the bladder-uterine dissection plane. Despite modest quantitative metrics, qualitative assessments indicated strong clinical utility. These findings establish a foundation for an integrated AI-assisted surgical navigation platform to enhance the safety and standardization of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42332308What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.