ArticleMedicine2026
Effects of social support and type D personality, with serial mediation by psychological resilience and positive coping styles - a cross-sectional study: Subjective well-being in hemodialysis patients.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The prevalence of Type D personality and its association with clinical outcomes in patients with cervical radiculopathy after either conservative or surgical treatment.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the effects of social support and type D personality on subjective well-being (SWB) in hemodialysis patients and to verify the serial mediating roles of psychological resilience and positive coping styles, addressing the lack of research on multifactor serial mediation mechanisms. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 427 hemodialysis patients in Shanxi, China. Pearson correlation, multiple linear regression, and bootstrap resampling (5000 resamples) were used for analysis, with annual household income and dialysis vintage as control variables. After controlling for covariates, social support positively predicted SWB (total effect = 0.361, P < .001), whereas type D personality negatively predicted SWB (total effect = -0.235, P < .001). Psychological resilience and positive coping styles exerted significant serial mediating effects in both pathways, with total indirect effects accounting for 55.12% and 59.15% of the total effects, respectively. All effects were statistically significant. Social support is a protective factor and type D personality a risk factor for SWB in hemodialysis patients. Both act through the serial mediating pathway of psychological resilience and positive coping styles, providing clear targets for clinical psychological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.