Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42332835›Full record

SynthesisWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

In Vivo Wound Healing Effects of Antimicrobial Peptide-Based Dressings for S. aureus-Infected Wounds-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lea Rodge, Artemis Stamboulis, Sarah A Kuehne, Melissa M Grant, Zubair Ahmed

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lea RodgeBiomaterials Research Group, School of Metallurgy and Materials, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9269-5027
Artemis StamboulisBiomaterials Research Group, School of Metallurgy and Materials, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sarah A KuehneNottingham Trent University, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6790-8433
Melissa M GrantPeriodontal Research Group, Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Zubair AhmedNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Department of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-6442

Funding

PATH mini CDT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether the addition of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) to dressing materials enhances their wound healing capabilities when applied to S. aureus-infected wounds in rodent models. The primary objective was not to derive definitive efficacy conclusions, but to systematically assess the quality, consistency, and translational readiness of existing in vivo evidence for AMP-based dressings in excisional wound models to inform future in vivo experimental design. The systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two authors independently completed the literature search using three electronic databases and two databases for grey literature. Studies were included if they met pre-established inclusion criteria. Rate of wound healing was considered as the primary outcome; the secondary outcome involved histological analyses of tissue samples of the wounds. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE risk of bias tool for animal studies and meta-analysis was performed with pooled data from three or more studies reporting the same outcome, employing a random effects model. By the final timepoint, the meta-analyses identified a significant increase in wound healing rate in both rats (mean difference = 2.79%, 95% CI [1.52%, 4.06%], p < 0.0001) and mice (mean difference = 32.30%, 95% CI [18.06%, 46.54%], p < 0.00001) exposed to AMP-based dressing materials compared to AMP-free carrier materials. The significantly improved wound healing rates provide promising evidence that these materials are suitable for promoting the wound healing of S. aureus-infected wounds that may be investigated further in clinical studies.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAntimicrobial PeptidesBandagesStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusWound HealingWound InfectionAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansRatsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAntimicrobial Peptidesantimicrobial peptidesdressinginfectionin vivowound healing

Identifiers

PMID42332835
PMCPMC13287310

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.