ArticleChemical biology & drug design2026
Biological and In Silico Evaluation of Novel Methoxyphenol-1,2,3-Triazole Hybrids as Multifunctional Anti-Alzheimer's and Anticancer Agents.
Article in Chemical biology & drug design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of multifunctional small molecules capable of simultaneously modulating multiple pathological pathways represents a rational strategy in medicinal chemistry for complex disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cancer. Herein, a novel series of methoxyphenol-based 1,2,3-triazole hybrids (5a-h) was designed and synthesized via Cu(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC). All derivatives were fully characterized by FT-IR,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.