ArticleCureus2026
Screening Sonography Detection of Liver Masses: Assessing the Non-emergent Nature of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Basic Emergency Service (BES) in Portugal operates in peripheral healthcare units with limited technological resources, where the main goal is rapid patient triage and timely referral whenever necessary. In units located far from a reference hospital, screening ultrasound may support clinical decision-making during the initial assessment. However, with its increasing use, incidental detection of abnormalities unrelated to the presenting complaint has also become more frequent, including focal liver lesions. We report the case of a 28-year-old woman presenting to a BES with abdominal complaints, in whom a screening ultrasound identified a hepatic mass that was ultimately considered unrelated to the symptoms motivating the emergency visit. Although the lesion raised diagnostic interest, the sonographic findings did not suggest an immediately life-threatening hepatic condition, and the overall clinical context did not justify emergent transfer to the reference hospital solely because of this incidental finding. The patient was therefore managed according to the acute complaint and referred for outpatient imaging characterization. Dedicated liver imaging later showed features most consistent with focal nodular hyperplasia, which remained a probable radiologic diagnosis in the absence of histologic confirmation. This case emphasizes an important challenge in peripheral emergency settings: sonographers performing screening ultrasound should be able to recognize findings that require urgent hospital referral and distinguish them from lesions that may be safely investigated in an ambulatory setting without compromising patient safety. The role of screening ultrasound in this context is not to establish a definitive pathological diagnosis, but rather to support clinical orientation, reduce unnecessary alarms, avoid inappropriate emergency referrals, and contribute to more efficient use of healthcare resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.