ArticleCureus2026
Effect of COVID-19 Vaccination on the Menstrual Cycle Among Women in Dubai.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The impact of COVID-19 vaccination on menstrual cycle regularity has raised public health concerns, particularly regarding vaccine hesitancy. Studies report mixed findings, ranging from minor, transient changes to more significant menstrual alterations, highlighting the need for post-vaccination monitoring. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe self-reported menstrual changes before and after COVID-19 vaccination among women aged 18-40 years in Dubai, UAE, including changes in menstrual flow, cycle interval, and associated symptoms, and to compare findings between recipients of the Pfizer and Sinopharm vaccines. Materials and methods This multicenter, retrospective observational study included 398 women who received either the Sinopharm or Pfizer vaccine over a six-month period and were subsequently asked about the regularity of their menstrual cycles before and after vaccination. Results Among 398 adult women (mean age 28.7 ± 5.0 years) vaccinated with Pfizer (73.1%) or Sinopharm (26.9%), 91.7% had regular menstrual cycles before vaccination. Post-vaccination, 78% of those with regular cycles maintained regularity, while 14% developed irregularities, more frequently among Pfizer recipients and women on hormonal therapy. Reported menstrual changes included prolonged cycles (5%), dysmenorrhea (3.8%), heavier bleeding (2.8%), shortened cycles (2.5%), spotting (1.3%), and amenorrhea (0.8%). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that some participants reported menstrual irregularities following receipt of either the Pfizer or Sinopharm vaccines. However, due to the retrospective observational design and limited follow-up period, the findings demonstrate only a temporal association, and it remains unclear whether these reported changes were temporary or directly related to vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.