ReviewThe plant genome2026
Application of deep learning in crop research: From genomics to phenomics.
Review in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of deep learning in crop research: From genomics to phenomics.The plant genome · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning, as a pivotal branch of machine learning, has demonstrated remarkable potential in advancing crop science by effectively integrating genomics and phenomics. This review systematically outlines the application of diverse deep learning architectures-such as convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, and transformers-across key crop genomic tasks, including gene expression prediction, alternative splicing analysis, cis-regulatory element identification, epigenomic profiling, and genome-based trait prediction. In phenomics, these models facilitate high-throughput extraction of crop phenotypic traits from multispectral, unmanned aerial vehicle, and ground-based imagery, supporting yield forecasting, disease diagnosis, and stress response monitoring. We critically evaluate the performance and limitations of each model type across tasks, considering trade-offs between complexity, accuracy, and interpretability, to offer practical guidance for crop researchers. Additionally, the review addresses major challenges in deploying deep learning-such as data scarcity, model transparency, and computational demands-and proposes future pathways to enhance model generalizability, multimodal data integration, and applications in intelligent breeding and sustainable agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.