Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42333875›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2026

Volume and surface methods for microparticle traction force microscopy: a computational and experimental comparison.

Simon Brauburger, Bastian K Kraus, Tobias Walther, Cornelis Mense, Tobias Abele, Kerstin Göpfrich, Ulrich S Schwarz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simon BrauburgerInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. schwarz@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8232-6336
Bastian K KrausInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. schwarz@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1537-4708
Tobias WaltherCenter for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. k.goepfrich@zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1397-6777
Cornelis MenseInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. schwarz@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6980-7103
Tobias AbeleCenter for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. k.goepfrich@zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2705-0983
Kerstin GöpfrichCenter for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. k.goepfrich@zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-3551
Ulrich S SchwarzInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. schwarz@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1483-640X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is an essential element of mechanobiology to measure the forces of biological cells. In microparticle traction force microscopy, they are inferred from the deformation of elastic microparticles. Two complementary variants have been introduced before: the volume method, which reconstructs surface stresses from the displacements of fiducial markers embedded inside the particles, and the surface method, which infers stresses directly from the deformation of the particle surface. However, a systematic comparison of the two methods has been lacking. Here, we quantitatively compare both approaches using simulated traction fields representing biologically relevant loading scenarios. We find that the surface method consistently reconstructs traction profiles with substantially lower errors than the volume method, which suffers from displacement tracking and stress calculation at the surface. At high noise levels, however, the performance gap becomes smaller. To compare the performance of the two methods in a realistic experimental setting, we developed DNA-based hydrogel microparticles equipped with both fluorescent surface labels and embedded fluorescent nanoparticles, enabling the direct comparison of the two methods within the same system. Compression experiments produced traction profiles consistent with Hertzian contact mechanics and confirmed the trends observed in the simulations. We also show that despite large experimental deformations and strains (both up to 20 percent), linear elasticity theory should still be valid. While our computational workflow establishes a framework to apply both methods, our experimental workflow establishes DNA microparticles as versatile and biocompatible probes for measuring cellular forces.

Indexed as

Microscopy, Atomic ForceComputer SimulationDNAElasticityNanoparticlesStress, MechanicalSurface PropertiesDNA

Identifiers

PMID42333875
PMCPMC13288728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.