SynthesisJournal of neurology2026
Exercise- and dietary pattern-based lifestyle interventions and neurocognitive function in adults: a Bayesian multilevel network and dose-response meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically review the effects of lifestyle interventions focused on exercise and dietary patterns on neurocognitive function in adults, and to examine their relative effects and dose-response relationships.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to March 20, 2026. A total of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 12,286 participants were included. Bayesian multilevel pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate overall cognition, memory, and executive function. RoB 2 and CINeMA were used to assess the credibility of the evidence.
resultsCombined interventions yielded small, but statistically significant cognitive benefits (overall cognition: SMD = 0.18; memory: SMD = 0.10; executive function: SMD = 0.09). These benefits were driven primarily by differences between the combined intervention and control or usual care, as well as exercise alone; compared with diet alone, the combined intervention still showed a small advantage for executive function. Network meta-analysis suggested that AE_MIND and AE_RT_MED were more beneficial for overall cognition, AE_RT_MIND and AE_RT_MED for memory, and AE_RT_CR and AE_MIND for executive function. Exploratory dose-response analyses suggested possible curvature in some spline-based models; however, comparison with simpler monotonic specifications did not provide robust evidence for a clinically interpretable non-linear or monotonic dose-response relationship.
conclusionCombined lifestyle interventions may produce statistically significant but modest improvements in cognitive function in adults, with benefits varying across cognitive domains. However, current evidence remains insufficient to support a standardized precision prescription, and high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the optimal combinations and dosages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334484What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.