Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42334664›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2026

To Trim or Not to Trim: Revisiting Acetabuloplasty During Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Overcoverage.

Jacob D Mikula, Rakan R Alshaibi, John J Kelly, Aaron J Krych, Mario Hevesi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacob D MikulaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-8457
Rakan R AlshaibiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
John J KellyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Aaron J KrychDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Mario HevesiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. hevesi.mario@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6208-878X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAcetabuloplasty is a common component of hip arthroscopy for pincer-type and mixed femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), yet the optimal degree of correction remains controversial. Historically, rim trimming has often been guided by radiographic normalization, particularly of the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA). The purpose of this review is to synthesize current evidence regarding acetabular morphology, radiographic assessment, clinical outcomes related to the degree of acetabular correction, and intraoperative strategies that support optimal correction during acetabuloplasty. RECENT

findingsRecent literature suggests that acetabular overcoverage should not be viewed as a uniform indication for [aggressive] rim resection. Although the LCEA remains a useful measure of acetabular coverage, it incompletely captures focal versus global overcoverage, acetabular version, and dynamic impingement. Mid-term studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes after hip arthroscopy for pincer morphology, with no consistent relationship between postoperative LCEA normalization and patient-reported outcomes. In addition, patients with residual postoperative overcoverage may achieve outcomes comparable to those with normalized coverage and may actually demonstrate lower rates of conversion to arthroplasty. At the same time, excessive rim resection risks iatrogenic undercoverage, instability, edge loading, and accelerated degeneration. Current evidence supports a patient specific rather than radiographically uniform approach to acetabuloplasty. Successful treatment appears to depend on restoring functional femoroacetabular clearance while preserving sufficient acetabular coverage for joint stability and load distribution. Incremental resection, dynamic intraoperative reassessment, labral preservation, and balanced correction of acetabular- and femoral-sided pathology are central to this strategy. Future studies should emphasize three-dimensional assessment, standardized reporting, and longer-term evaluation of joint preservation.

Indexed as

AcetabuloplastyFemoroacetabular impingementHip arthroscopy

Identifiers

PMID42334664
PMCPMC13291294

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.