ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026
Diagnosis and Management of Loeys-Dietz Syndrome: Evidence Gaps and Future Directions.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review summarizes current knowledge on Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS), including its genetic basis, multisystem manifestations, diagnosis, surveillance, and management. It also highlights key evidence gaps in risk stratification, medical therapy, imaging surveillance, surgical thresholds, and care of pregnant and pediatric patients. RECENT
findingsAlthough understanding of the genetic basis and clinical spectrum of LDS has improved, LDS-specific evidence remains limited. LDS is increasingly recognized as a multisystem disorder with aggressive aortic disease, extra-aortic vascular involvement, skeletal, craniofacial, allergic, gastrointestinal, and neurodevelopmental manifestations. Current recommendations are largely based on expert consensus and experience with related connective tissue disorders. Most available research focuses on the aortic root and ascending aorta, with less evidence guiding management of peripheral vascular disease. LDS requires early diagnosis, individualized risk assessment, and multidisciplinary longitudinal care supported by genetic evaluation, biomarker-based approaches, multimodality imaging, and structured surveillance. Future research should focus on multicenter registries, genotype-phenotype correlations, biomarker validation, advanced imaging, and LDS-specific therapeutic studies to develop evidence-based guidelines and improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334665What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.