ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
Development and reliability testing of BRANT-MERQS-2A: A quality assessment tool for medication review type 2a reports.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMedication reviews (MRs) are increasingly implemented to optimize medication use and address drug-related problems in patients with complex pharmacotherapy, with medication review type 2a (MR2a) representing an intermediate format involving a pharmacist-led structured assessment with patient interview, based on clinical and medication data, without direct prescriber interaction. Despite their widespread implementation, systematic and operational approaches to evaluate the quality of MRs remain limited. In Belgium, Medication Review type 2a (MR2a) has been implemented in routine practice of community pharmacies since 2023, yet no validated instruments exist to evaluate the quality of written MR2a reports.
aimThis study aimed to adapt the existing BRANT-MERQS framework for the quality evaluation of MR2a reports and to assess the usability, reproducibility and reliability of the resulting tool (BRANT-MERQS-2A).
methodRelevant criteria were selected from the original BRANT-MERQS and expanded with criterion-specific instructions to form the BRANT-MERQS-2A. Initial testing involved two student assessors independently evaluating 98 MR2a reports, with interrater agreement (IRA) assessed using weighted Cohen's Kappa. In a subsequent extended testing phase, the same reports were assessed by 61 final-year pharmacy students, with three randomly selected students evaluating each MR2A report. Interrater reliability was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Gwet's AC1. Assessment duration was recorded to evaluate feasibility.
resultsInitial testing demonstrated strong IRA between the two student assessors. In the extended student cohort, agreement at the criterion level ranged from poor to moderate, with an overall ICC of 0.62, indicating moderate reliability. Criteria differed in discriminatory capacity, with some showing high absolute agreement but limited variability. Assessment time decreased over successive rounds, reflecting a learning effect and improved efficiency.
conclusionThe BRANT-MERQS-2A provides a feasible and structured approach for assessing the quality of MR2a reports. While variability at criterion level reflects the inherent complexity of MR2a, the tool demonstrates potential for self-and peer-assessment and offers a valuable foundation for further refinement and integration into routine quality monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.