ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
The association between composite dietary antioxidant index and the presence of cancer in elderly.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOxidative stress and antioxidant balance play critical roles in carcinogenesis, particularly among older adults who experience increased oxidative burden. This study explored the association between the composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI) and cancer prevalence in the elderly.
methodsData from 4,907 elderly participants were analyzed and categorized into quartiles (Q1-Q4) according to CDAI. Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer across quartiles, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the consistency across subgroups.
resultsParticipants with higher CDAI levels were more likely to be male, educated, and have lower diabetes prevalence. The prevalence of cancer increased across CDAI quartiles (19.6% in Q1 to 27.5% in Q4, P < 0.001). In fully adjusted models, Q4 had higher odds of cancer (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.54, P = 0.029). Subgroup analyses indicated stronger associations among women and those with diabetes.
conclusionsUnexpectedly, higher CDAI was associated with a greater prevalence of cancer among elderly individuals, suggesting complex, context-dependent effects of dietary antioxidants on cancer prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42334769What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.