ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
MetagenomicKG: a knowledge graph for metagenomic applications.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- KG-Microbe: Building modular and scalable knowledge graphs for microbiome and microbial sciences.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Hypothesizing mechanistic links between microbes and disease using knowledge graphs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MicrobiomeKG: bridging microbiome research and host health through knowledge graphs.Frontiers in systems biology · 2025Article
- MicrobiomeKG: Bridging Microbiome Research and Host Health Through Knowledge Graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe sheer volume and variety of genomic content within microbial communities makes metagenomics a field rich in biomedical knowledge. To traverse these complex communities and their vast unknowns, metagenomic studies often depend on distinct reference databases, such as the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB), the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC), for various analytical purposes. These databases are crucial for the genetic and functional annotation of microbial communities. Nevertheless, the inconsistent nomenclature or identifiers of these databases present challenges for effective integration, representation, and utilization. Knowledge graphs (KGs) offer an appropriate solution by organizing biological entities from different databases to standardized identifiers, allowing their interrelations to be captured into a cohesive network regardless of the naming conventions used in each source. The graph structure not only facilitates the unveiling of hidden patterns but also enriches our biological understanding with deeper insights. Despite KGs having shown potential in various biomedical fields, their application in metagenomics remains underexplored.
resultsWe present MetagenomicKG, a novel knowledge graph specifically tailored for metagenomic analysis. MetagenomicKG integrates taxonomic, functional, and pathogenesis-related information on the human microbiome sourced from various databases, and further connects these with existing biomedical KGs to expand the biological network. Through various case studies involving the human microbiome, we demonstrate its utility in enabling hypothesis generation regarding the relationships between microbes and diseases, generating sample-specific graph embeddings, and providing robust pathogen prediction. CODE AVAILABILITY: The source code and technical details for constructing the MetagenomicKG and reproducing all analyses are available on GitHub at https://github.com/KoslickiLab/MetagenomicKG. The data used in this manuscript, including the pre-built files and use case input data, are archived on Zenodo with DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17546861.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.