ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Quality education initiative to reduce pressure ulcers in high-risk-admitted patients in low-resource settings.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPressure injuries, although preventable, are a persistent challenge for admitted patients in hospitals globally, especially in low-resource settings. High-risk patients include the elderly, the immobile and those with terminal illness. A hospital-wide quality education initiative was launched at a tertiary care hospital after an increasing trend of pressure injuries was seen among inpatients across different units. This initiative aimed to assess the effectiveness of a simple, easy-to-use Turning Clock Tool to reduce the occurrence, severity and undesired outcomes of pressure injuries.
methodsThe quality education initiative was implemented over 6 months in three stages: the preintervention stage from 1 November 2023 to 31 January 2024, the implementation and training stage during February 2024, and a postintervention stage from 1 March 2024 to 31 May 2024. All inpatients admitted for at least 24 hours were included in the study. Nurses and caregivers were trained on the use of the tool to reposition patients every 2 hours. The incidence of pressure injuries, location, staging and the duration of hospital stay were compared before and after the implementation of the tool.
resultsThere was a 77.36% reduction in the incidence of pressure injuries from 53 to 12 cases. All stage-3 pressure injuries were eliminated while a significant decrease in stage-4 pressure injuries was seen. The gluteal and sacral regions were the most affected parts of the body. Patients with advanced age were the most affected. Average length of stay dropped from 11 days to 5 days.
conclusionThe Turning Clock Tool evaluated effectiveness, feasibility and contextual significance for preventing pressure injuries in low-resource hospital settings. Its use not only decreased the incidence and severity of pressure injuries but also reduced the average length of hospital stays. The Turning Clock Tool can be used as a simple yet cost-effective model to prevent pressure injuries in similar resource-constrained settings globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.