ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2026
Failed resolution of inflammation in intracerebral haemorrhage.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is a subtype of stroke, with resulting long-term disability determined by secondary brain injury. The prevailing biphasic model of neuroinflammation, which conceptualizes a temporal transition from acute to chronic stages, fails to reconcile persistent clinical trial failures or to explain the mechanisms underpinning the progression to chronic neurological deficits. We propose that the core pathology is the failure of acute inflammation to resolve in a timely manner owing to a functional collapse of physiological pro-resolution programmes, governed by dysregulation at critical molecular checkpoints such as the USP11-p53 axis. This failure locks the microenvironment into a destructive, non-resolving state, perpetuating immune-mediated damage. We discuss the evidence for a causal link between this checkpoint failure and the defining chronic sequelae: progressive white matter injury, inhibitory gliosis and large-scale network disconnection. We conceptualize the long-term motor, cognitive and affective impairments as a cohesive clinical entity, which we term post-ICH sequelae. This framework calls for a therapeutic reorientation from broad immunosuppression towards precision pro-resolution strategies such as USP11 inhibitors guided by biomarker-based immune staging. This Perspective provides a theoretical foundation, currently supported predominantly by preclinical evidence, and a translational roadmap for improving long-term recovery after ICH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42337005What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.