Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337033›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Effect of climate change on milk production and yield of buffalo, indigenous cattle and crossbred cattle in Haryana, India.

Ruchi Yadav, Sanjit Maiti, Sanchita Garai, Mukesh Bhakat, Anil Kumar Dixit, Anjali Aggarwal, Goutam Mondal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruchi YadavDairy Extension Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India.
Sanjit MaitiDairy Extension Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India. sanjit.ndri@gmail.com.
Sanchita GaraiDairy Extension Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India.
Mukesh BhakatAPR Division, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goat, Makhdoom, Farah, Mathura, 281122, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anil Kumar DixitDairy Economics, Statistics and Management Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India.
Anjali AggarwalAnimal Physiology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India.
Goutam MondalAnimal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change significantly undermines livestock productivity worldwide, with profound implications for milk production. Unprecedented climatic changes indiscriminately affect the dairy production across the global south with profound effects on the Trans-Gangetic plains, especially the high milk production tract of Haryana. Hence, this study employs panel data analysis to assess the impact of climatic variables, including annual minimum, maximum, and mean temperatures, heavy rainfall incidence, temperature-humidity index (THI), and potential evapotranspiration (PET) on milk yield and production in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis), indigenous cattle (Bos indicus), and crossbred cattle (Bos taurus × Bos indicus) in Haryana, India, from 2004 to 2019. The study was based on data spanning 16 years of Integrated Sample Survey in Haryana, adopting a stratified three-stage sampling design (districts → villages/households → animals) with complete livestock population enumeration. Annually, 1,148 villages were surveyed for recording milk yield and milk production. Crossbred cattle, indigenous cattle and buffalo had daily milk yields of 8.08, 5.23 and 7.64 kg/day with annual production of 788.24, 338.81 and 6045.02 MT, respectively. The yearly population estimates based on complete enumeration, viz., indigenous cattle (n₁ = 0.179 million), crossbred cattle (n₂ = 0.291 million), and buffalo (n₃ = 2.22 million). The findings reveal that high temperatures (> 38 °C) combined with elevated humidity (> 70%) during July and August significantly reduce milk production, whereas winter temperatures exhibit negligible effects. Notably, PET (p < 0.01 for May and June across all species) emerges as a critical climatic indicator alongside THI and heatwaves, necessitating its integration with solar radiation, ambient temperature, and vapour pressure in climate impact assessments. These results underscore PET's role in shaping adaptive strategies for sustainable livestock production amid global warming.

Indexed as

BuffaloesClimate ChangeLactationMilkAnimalsCattleDairyingFemaleHumidityIndiaTemperatureBuffaloCattleChanging climateImpactsMilk productionMilk yieldPanel data

Identifiers

PMID42337033
PMCPMC13578687

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.