Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337345›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Prediction of college student psychological state based on deep learning framework combining the improved Whale Optimization Algorithm and LSTM.

Xiaohan Sun, Hanhui Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaohan SunShandong Institute of Petroleum and Chemical Technology, Dongying, 257100, Shandong, China.
Hanhui LiuShandong Institute of Petroleum and Chemical Technology, Dongying, 257100, Shandong, China. lhh821223@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In intelligent education, accurate prediction of college students' psychological states is crucial for teaching quality improvement and mental health interventions. Psychological state data with temporal dependency and nonlinearity limits traditional machine learning, while Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) is sensitive to hyperparameters and prone to premature convergence. To solve these problems, this paper proposes a CNWOA-LSTM framework combining an improved Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) with LSTM: chaotic initialization is introduced to enhance population diversity and global search ability, and a niche operator is added to alleviate premature convergence; the improved WOA optimizes key LSTM hyperparameters (hidden units, learning rate, dropout rate, batch size). Experiments are conducted on a public kaggle dataset of college students' behavioral features, learning interaction data and psychological assessment indicators. CNWOA-LSTM is compared with traditional machine learning models (SVM, Random Forest, GBDT), classical deep learning models (CNN, Transformer, GRU, BiLSTM), and meta-heuristic optimized LSTM models (DE-LSTM, HHO-LSTM, MPA-LSTM, AOA-LSTM, RSA-LSTM). Results show CNWOA-LSTM achieves 93.64% accuracy, 9.33% and 6.63% higher than original LSTM and standard WOA-LSTM respectively, and 5.21%-7.34% higher than other meta-heuristic optimized LSTM models, verifying its effectiveness for psychological state prediction.

Indexed as

Deep LearningStudentsAlgorithmsHumansLong Short Term MemoryPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestSoft ComputingUniversitiesChaotic initializationLSTMMeta-heuristic optimizationNiche operatorPsychological state predictionWhale Optimization Algorithm

Identifiers

PMID42337345
PMCPMC13578315

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.